HRKM News / All
October 17, 2018
Folklore in the construction business is that you can safely throw out your records after seven years because the IRS will only chase you for that long. Effective July 1, 2018, people in the business need to basically double that period, because of the Florida Legislature has extended the ten year statute of repose for construction claims, through its 2018 amendment to Sec. 95.11(3)(c), Fla. Stat.
Until about 2013, we all “knew” that a plaintiff with claiming a construction effect had to sue within 10 years of completion of “the work”, even as to latent defects. The Legislature conferred this absolute bar on claims, regardless of whether they could be discovered by the building owner, to provide financial protection to the construction industry against stale claims. Much was made in the case law and scholarly articles about the unfairness of defending claims after files were thrown out, employees moved on, and insurance policies expired. “[I]n 1980, the legislature reenacted the statute stating an overwhelming public need…” after the Florida supreme court inOverland Constr. Co. v. Sirmons, 369 So. 2d 572 (Fla. 1979) had struck down a previous statute of repose.Sabal Chase Homeowners Ass’n v. Walt Disney World Co., 726 So. 2d 796, 799 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) After 1980, a contractor (or sub) could diligently calendar ten years from project completion before tossing its project files in the shredder. (This was never really true, but it’s what many people believed).
The misunderstanding was because the repose period had four possible trigger dates to start it running, including the “completion of the contract.” This post won’t go into the legal controversy over the last several years over what the term “completion of the contract” means. What is clear is the Fifth DCA decided in 2015 that it meant “the making of final payment by the owner to the general contractor or architect”, and not the physical completion of the construction work.Cypress Fairway Condo. v. Bergeron Constr. Co., 164 So. 3d 706 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015). AfterCypress Fairwayswas decided in 2015, there was clearly no longer a ten year bright line repose period.
The Legislature tried to address this problem in 2017 by adding the following definition of completion:
“Completion of the contract means the later of the date of final performance of all the contracted services or the date that final payment for such services becomes due without regard to the date final payment is made.”
In theory, under this amendment, the parties could look to the contract for the date performance would be due, and have a bright line rule again. Of course, the date final payment is legally due is a matter people disagree about often. In reality, final payment comes due to the general contractor not on the 1stof the month like the rent under a lease, but (usually) 30 days after it submits a payment application for retainage, and then, only if the application is correct and complete, and then, the owner may dispute whether money should be withheld for unsatisfactory work. Entire chapters of construction law books are written around this issue. This is no country for bright lines.
Effective July 1, 2018, the Legislature has opened another extension to the ten year repose period. A defendant may avoid the statute of repose when filing a third party claim or crossclaim against another person in the chain of construction:
“However, counterclaims, cross-claims, and third-party claims that arise out of the conduct, transaction, or occurrence set out or attempted to be set out in a pleading may be commenced up to 1 year after the pleading to which such claims relate is served, even if such claims would otherwise be time barred.“
The scenario this contemplates is common: a developer may be sued by a condominium association, and then attempts to bring claims against its general contractor or design team. Or a general contractor may be sued, and it may attempt to third party in its subcontractors. The concern this amendment addresses is that the defendant may be sued late in the repose period (say, nine years and 364 days after the contract was completed — yes, it has really happened), and not have time to pass the claim through to subtrades who did the work, because of the difficulty evaluating the claim, finding the subcontracts, formulating the pleading and the like.
On its face, and perhaps in intent, this extends the repose period to 11 years, and only for potential third party defendants like subcontractors or subconsultants. In practice, the ten years plus one year equals eleven years is not the real repose period. A few examples illustrate this:
- Plaintiff condominium association sues general contractor nine years and 364 days after completion (call it ten years for simplicity). Defendant general contractor identifies the responsible subs and sues them at the end of year eleven. Then, plaintiff amends its complaint in year 12 after completion, to add new defects or clarify allegations. It’s unlikely the court will not hold that the amendment “relates back” to the original filing. If new subcontractors are implicated in the amended complaint, filed after eleven years, the defendant general contractor may have another year – year 12 or 13 – to sue these subs.
- A subcontractor who is served with a third party complaint may itself have hired a subsub or a materialman. The third party defendant subcontractor, joined in the case, say, at the end of year eleven, arguably hasanother yearto bring its own third party claims against its subsubs or vendors. They would have no repose until as late as 12 years after “completion”. If so, they would remain at risk that the defendant general contractor could amend its third party claim against the subcontractor, and that in turn triggers a new set of issues and parties being implicated, in year 12 to 13.
- Some may object that a claim by a subcontractor against its subsubcontractor is a “fourth party complaint,” and the amendment to 95.11 only reopens the repose period for a “third party complaint”.. A careful reading of Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.180 shows there is no such terminology as a “fourth party complaint,” and Sec. 95.11(3)(c) does not define a “third party complaint”. To the contrary, Rule 1.180, entitled “Third Party Practice”, specifically authorizes a third party defendant to “proceed under this rule [called “Third Party Practice”] against any person… who is or may be liable…” While colloquially we might call this a “fourth party complaint”, Rule 1.180 calls this process part of “Third Party Practice”. “Third party” seems to mean “somebody other than the plaintiff (first party) or defendant (second party)”, and not “the guy under the second “vs.” in the case style, but not under any subsequent “vs.”” in the case style.”
Our point is that the idea of a ten year repose period from the time a contractor or sub did “the work” was never quite correct (for reasons outside the scope of this post). The 2018 amendment makes it absolutely clear that persons in the chain of construction are at risk for at least eleven, and probably thirteen, or more, years. Even that assumes there is a bright line date for “completion of the contract,” and that’s a questionable assumption.
The point of the statute of repose was to create such a readily discernible safe harbor date, that people in the industry and plaintiffs could understand and guide their conduct by. Ever since the Second DCA opened the door (in this lawyer’s opinion) in 2013 inClearwater Hous. Auth. v. Future Cap. Holding Corp., 126 So. 3d 410 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) to a legalistic and highly technical concept of “completion of the contract,” the benefit of a bright line rule has been an illusion. Here’s the disconnect: a subcontractor who thinks he understands the “ten year” rule knows he last did work on a job on, say, June 1, 2007, and on June 1, 2017, he can no longer be sued. In reality, afterClearwater HousingandCypress Fairway Condo. v. Bergeron Constr. Co., 164 So. 3d 706 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015), the repose period ran from events such as the delivery of submittals and the making of final payment, between the owner and the general contractor. These are events the typical subcontractor would not know about, and would not be able to prove out of his own records. If the Legislature’s goal was to enable a small business to walk into court, hold up a job log entry or check for payment and shut down a lawsuit on a ten year old job, the 2017 and 2018 amendments to Sec. 95.11(3)(c) have not restored that refuge against stale claims. Those in the construction and insurance industries and those who represent them should adjust their expectations, and record retention, accordingly.
Sec. 95.11(3)(c) , as of July 1, 2018, now reads:
(3) WITHIN FOUR YEARS.—
(b) An action relating to the determination of paternity, with the time running from the date the child reaches the age of majority.
1(c) An action founded on the design, planning, or construction of an improvement to real property, with the time running from the date of actual possession by the owner, the date of the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the date of abandonment of construction if not completed, or the date of completion of the contract or termination of the contract between the professional engineer, registered architect, or licensed contractor and his or her employer, whichever date is latest; except that, when the action involves a latent defect, the time runs from the time the defect is discovered or should have been discovered with the exercise of due diligence. In any event, the action must be commenced within 10 years after the date of actual possession by the owner, the date of the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the date of abandonment of construction if not completed, or the date of completion of the contract or termination of the contract between the professional engineer, registered architect, or licensed contractor and his or her employer, whichever date is latest. However, counterclaims, cross-claims, and third-party claims that arise out of the conduct, transaction, or occurrence set out or attempted to be set out in a pleading may be commenced up to 1 year after the pleading to which such claims relate is served, even if such claims would otherwise be time barred. With respect to actions founded on the design, planning, or construction of an improvement to real property, if such construction is performed pursuant to a duly issued building permit and if a local enforcement agency, state enforcement agency, or special inspector, as those terms are defined in s.553.71, has issued a final certificate of occupancy or certificate of completion, then as to the construction which is within the scope of such building permit and certificate, the correction of defects to completed work or repair of completed work, whether performed under warranty or otherwise, does not extend the period of time within which an action must be commenced. Completion of the contract means the later of the date of final performance of all the contracted services or the date that final payment for such services becomes due without regard to the date final payment is made.
State Of Florida Starts Receivership Proceedings Against Fednat Insurance Company
On September 23, 2022, the Florida Department of Insurance filed a petition to place FedNat Insurance Co. in receivership. The petition alleges that FedNat acknowledged in September 2022 that it did not have enough cash on hand to meet its current ob
Florida Special Legislative Session Amendment To Building Code “25% Rule” Impacts Roofers, Homeowners And Insurers
Building owners needing repairs on a portion of their building are often chagrined to discover that they must pay for an entirely new assembly, because of the “25% rule”. This was a requirement in the Florida Building Code (2017 Florida Buildin
Florida Court Holds HDD Is Not An Abnormally Dangerous Activity; Alleged Damage to Bridge 90 Feet From HDD Bore Held Not Foreseeable As A Matter of Law
A Florida circuit court has rejected a claim by a property owner that HDD is an abnormally dangerous activity, and that the HDD contractor cannot be subjected to strict liability for damage alleged to bridge. In an earlier ruling, the court held th
Beginning April 1, FFCRA Requires Employers Of 500 Persons Or Less To Provide Paid Medical Leave To Certain Employees Affected By Covid-19 — But Only If The Employee Can’t “Telework”
The Families First Coronavirus Response Act (“FFCRA”) was passed by Congress and signed by the President on March 18, 2020. (The law in question is technically titled “Emergency Paid Sick Leave Act” see H.R. 6201 §5101. We’ll call
Florida Department of Economic Opportunity Is Pushing Out Emergency Bridge Loans to Small Business at 0% Interest For One Year
To assist small businesses to stay open and pay employees during the COVID-19 slowdown, Governor DeSantis has authorized the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity to extend 0% interest emergency bridge loans to small businesses. The loans ar
HRKM Wins Directed Verdict in Auto Repair Professional Liability Case
An often overlooked consideration during most initial case evaluations, is the applicability of the Statute of Limitations. A prime purpose of the statute of limitations is to protect defendants from facing surprise and stale claims which positio
HRKM Collaborates with ABC Student Chapter
Hill, Rugh, Keller & Main is proud to be a member of the largest commercial construction trade association, Associated Builders and Contractors (ABC), Central Florida Chapter. According to ABC’s website, “the Central Florida Chapter of ABC i
Statute of Limitations for Roof Defect Claim Runs from Time of Notice of Roof Leak Not Knowledge of the Specific Defect
The Third District Court of Appeal inCovenant Baptist Church, Inc.v.Vasallo Construction, Inc.in an opinion filed on May 22, 2019, held that an owner was barred by the statute of limitations from filing a lawsuit for a defective roof when th
Proposed amendment to ch. 558 would require nonbinding arbitration and allocation of damages to “own work”
During the first week of March, a bill (SB 1246/HB911) to modify the chapter 558 process by adding nonbinding arbitration was filed in the Florida House. Proposed Sec. 558.045 would require nonbinding arbitration in any construction defect lawsuit
The Repose That Wasn’t: Florida Extends The Statute of Repose For Construction Claims By A Year (Or Maybe More)
Folklore in the construction business is that you can safely throw out your records after seven years because the IRS will only chase you for that long. Effective July 1, 2018, people in the business need to basically double that period, because o
Protecting Your Business Domain Begins When You Select It
Check out the link below to read HRKM Owner and Partner, Chris Hill’s, Forbes magazine article.https://www.forbes.com/sites/groupthink/2018/02/25/protecting-your-business-domain-begins-when-you-select-it/#3c6da553130e
Former Congressman Ric Keller’s T.V. Commentary on President Trump’s SOTU Address
Check out Former Congressman Ric Keller’s T.V. commentary on President Trump’s State of the Union Address (see at 1 min.)https://www.fox35orlando.com/politics/310093012-video
Defending Class Action Lawsuits
Have you been served with a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) class action? If so, several questions come to mind: What is the TCPA? Why am I being sued? How do I make this TCPA lawsuit go away without destroying my business?By
Defending Property Owners When Serious Construction Accidents Happen
Has a construction worker been injured while working on your property? If so, several questions come to mind: Will I be sued? Do I have enough insurance? Could the millions of dollars sought by plaintiffs’ attorneys for alleged wrongful death or
Is There Still A Right To Setoff Settlement Amounts Paid By A Co-Defendant In A Negligence Case Involving Multiple Defendants
Florida Statute § 768.81, titled “Comparative Fault”, provides a statutory scheme for determining damages in a “negligence action” and apportioning these damages if there are multiple parties involved. The statute expressly defines a
Florida’s Open House Party Statute: Don’t Be The “Cool” Parents!
Many of our friends have “kids” who are in the 18-20 year old range. Whether they are older high school students or younger college students, many of them want to have “a few friends over” to Mom and Dad’s house. Spring Break, graduati
Attorney Ric Keller Discusses State Attorney Aramis Ayala’s Decision To Sue Governor Rick Scott
Check out Ric Keller on this morning’s Fox 35 segment as he discusses recent news of State Attorney, Aramis Ayala’s decision to sue Florida Governor, Ric Scott.https://www.fox35orlando.com/good-day/248107537-video
Issues To Consider If Your Personal Injury Claimant Is A Medicare Beneficiary, And Is Being Treated Under Letters Of Protection
One of the more challenging aspects of successful claims resolution arises in situations where a personal injury claimant receives medical care and treatment pursuant to letters of protection. A letter of protection (“LOP”), of course, is an a
Construction Liens: How Do You Prove The Date Of “Final Furnishing?”
Most construction folks in Florida know that to lien a job, the lienor must file its lien within 90 days of ….something. An unpaid lienor usually starts focusing on this question sometime after its pay application hasn’t been paid for a month
Chris Hill Receives Golden Gavel Award
HRKM Partner, Chris Hill, was recently awarded Westfield Insurance Company’s Golden Gavel Award! Presented by Jim Schumaker, the Golden Gavel was given to Chris for his outstanding handling of a claim on behalf of Westfield. We want to congratula
Happy Holidays from Everyone at HRKM
Wishing you and your family happiness this Holiday Season and throughout the coming year from all of us at Hill, Rugh, Keller & Main!
HRKM Owner, Chris Hill Participates in Charity Golf Scramble
HRKM Owner and Partner, Chris Hill and friends participated inBASE Camp Children’s Cancer Foundation‘s Golf Scramble this past weekend. HRKM was honored to sponsor this organization which supports childrenand their families going tho
HRKM Attorneys Attend OCBA Event in Downtown Orlando
HRKM Attorneys, Nick Patrick, Andrew Showen and Scott Reed had the privilege of attending the Orange County Bar Association’s Joint Voluntary Happy Hour in Downtown Orlando last night. Thank you to the OCBA for hosting such a great event!
Hurricane Matthew Reminded Us What Insureds Can Lose When They Give Assignments of Benefits
Hurricane Matthew has brought out repair contractors offering services to property owners who have suffered damages to their homes, businesses and condominiums. Already we’ve seen one form of agreement between a repair contractor and a condomini
Partners & Staff of HRKM Show Support for Breast Cancer Awareness
Inrecognitionof Breast Cancer Awareness Month, partners and staff of Hill, Rugh, Keller & Main, P.L. “pink-out” the office in Orlando. #BreastCancerAwarenessMonth#PinktoberOrlando
Employee Or Independent Contractor: What You Need To Know
The issue of whether an individual is an employee or an independent contractor for liability purposes is not always clear-cut. To resolve the issue, Florida courts apply a multifactor test, with the most important factor being the “extent of contr
HRKM Attorney’s Winning Verdict in Asian Antiques Case
Chris Hill recently won a jury trial in a commercial litigation case for a local antiques dealer. HRKM filed suit on behalf of a family-owned Winter Park company, seeking to collect more than $1 million from purchasers located in Chicago. Th
Aerial Photos Provide Inexpensive and Compelling Evidence
HRKM lawyers used aerial photography taken over time in a recent trial to prove that a property had numerous gaps in a fence line which the plaintiff claimed was secure. In the above photo from property appraiser’s public records, one can se
HRKM Staff Attends Popular Networking Event in Orlando
Partner, Ric Keller and staff of HRKM had the privilege of attending TCU Construction’s Networking Event at Bar Louie last Thursday. Our staff had an amazing time meeting everyone who participated in this occasion!
HRKM Lawyers Recover Costs From Plaintiff After Dismissal of Warehouse Fire Case
Chris Hill and Andy Showen secured a judgment of dismissal at the close of plaintiff’s case in a Federal court trial in Orlando in December 2015. The court taxed defense costs against the plaintiff of over $17,000 in post-trial proceedings, whic
Can Legal Draftsmanship Fix The Florida Constitution Statute of Repose Problem?
We often hear that Florida has a ten year statute of repose for claims arising out of construction. Contractors design their risk management plans (such as they are) assuming there is an absolute ten year bar against lawsuits. But the ten yea
“What Do You Mean We Have To Go To Pennsylvania To Enforce Our Warranty?”: Roof Replacement, Venue Clauses, Warranty Limitations, And Other Pitfalls In Condominium Repair Contracts
The Life and Death of a Roof: A condominium building with a low-slope roof (commonly but incorrectly referred to as a “flat” roof) will need a reroof every seven to twenty years. This is a major budget item that can cost from $8 to $15 per squar
Performance Bonds , Indemnity Agreements and Contractor’s Spouses
Building contractors often have to provide performance bonds to owners. Do their spouses understand they are cosigning for those bonds and may lose their homes and personal assets when obtaining the bond?Contractors’ spouses’ risk on bon
What is the statute of repose in Florida for construction? ›
In Florida, a claim based on the design, planning, or construction of an improvement to real property is subject to a four year statute of repose starting from when the owner taking possession, the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, abandonment of the project if not complete or when the contract is completed or ...What is the difference between statute of repose and statute of limitations in Florida? ›
A statute of limitations starts running when the plaintiff suffers an injury or a loss, discovers a defect, or learns of the cause of action. A statute of repose begins to run when a specified event occurs. For example, in construction cases, the statute of repose typically begins to run once construction is completed.What is a statute of repose in Florida? ›
The purpose of a statute of repose is to cut off the right of action after a specified time measured from a discrete event, regardless of the time of the accrual of the cause of action or when the claimant knew or should have known of the claim.What is the statute of repose for breach of contract in Florida? ›
Is There a Statute of Limitations on Breach of Contract in Florida? Under Florida law, most legal or equitable actions based upon a breach of a written contract must be brought within five years.What does repose period mean? ›
A law that extinguishes a right of action after a specified period of time has elapsed, regardless of whether the cause of action has accrued. Courts generally find that statutes of repose begin to run without interruption once the triggering event occurs.What is the rescission period in Florida? ›
In Florida, if you contract for services to be rendered in the future on a continuing basis, you are entitled to a three-day cooling-off period.